People · Europe

Switzerland

Source dates shown with each finding

← Switzerland overview
Switzerland · People

People Intelligence

Public opinion and socioeconomic subgroup evidence from approved external survey sources. Exact source framing and methodological caveats remain visible.

Switzerland · Financial resilience

89.8% say their household could cover basic needs for at least a month

Nearly nine in ten respondents in Switzerland said their household could cover basic needs for a month or more if income were lost.

Lloyd's Register Foundation World Risk Poll · Fieldwork 2025

People · Generations · Financial milestones

The “maybe later” economy.

Housing, education, work and family choices increasingly collide with financial pressure. PolisMetric keeps the U.S. Pew benchmark separate from Deloitte’s same-wave Gen Z and millennial country evidence so unlike questions are never forced into one ranking.

Verified 2026 country result

Switzerland

#11of 15 verified countries on Gen Z delayed major decisions
Delayed decisions

Delayed major life decisions

Gen Z46%
Millennials60%

Share saying finances caused them to delay major life decisions such as marriage, starting a family or business, or further education.

Housing shapes career

Housing costs affect career decisions

Gen Z78%
Millennials67%

Share saying housing affordability affects career decisions.

Home out of reach

Cannot afford to own a home

Gen Z54%
Millennials53%

Share saying they cannot afford to own a home.

Same-question international comparison

Financial pressure is delaying major life decisions.

These 15 country results come from the same Deloitte 2026 survey wave and the same question. Paired dots show published percentages for Gen Z and millennials; the connector shows the gap. This is not a quality ranking. Countries without a verified national value remain outside the ranking.

Thailand65%57%
Philippines64%64%
Argentina59%67%
Mexico57%52%
Italy56%51%
Australia55%45%
India54%44%
Sweden52%49%
Singapore51%50%
Netherlands51%45%
Switzerland46%60%
United Kingdom46%46%
China46%35%
Germany45%39%
Brazil45%36%

Deloitte Global 2026 Gen Z and Millennial Survey · fielded Nov. 24, 2025–Jan. 15, 2026 · online self-complete survey. The global study includes 22,595 respondents in 44 countries; this chart contains only source-verified country cuts in the current PolisMetric evidence pass.

Country source

Deloitte 2026 Gen Z and Millennial Survey — Switzerland · published Jun 18, 2026 · N=400. Values are attributed public results and remain source-defined.

Source
Deloitte Global 2026 Gen Z and Millennial Survey
Population
Gen Z and millennials in the source-defined national samples
Fieldwork
2025-11-24/2026-01-15
Sample
22,595 across 44 countries; country sample sizes vary
Uncertainty
Not supplied for these displayed estimates; consult the source methodology.
Question and methods

Share saying finances caused them to delay major life decisions. The separate U.S. Pew anchor uses a different population and question.

Read source methods ↗

Source-defined populations and questions remain separate. Missing observations are not estimated or changed to zero.

People Intelligence · Switzerland · Young women

Political divides and mental health — measured as separate evidence streams.

PolisMetric does not assume that the U.S. pattern applies everywhere. For Switzerland, political or gender-attitude evidence is shown only when a governed source supports it, and mental-health evidence is kept methodologically separate. An association is never inferred merely because both measures appear on the same page.

CoveragePolitics gap · Mental-health evidenceNo synthetic national values
Political / values evidence

Directly comparable youth evidence not located

Governed evidence gap
Evidence gapNo comparable national youth-politics subgroup is published in this module.

No directly comparable country-specific young-women political/ideology subgroup result was located in the governed cross-country sources used for this module.

Mental-health evidence

Young-women psychological distress

Women ages 15–24 · 2022

Swiss Health Survey: 29% of women ages 15–24 had medium or high psychological distress in 2022, up from 19% in 2017.

Interpretation ruleDo not turn two separate datasets into a causal story.

Political ideology, party affiliation, feminist self-identification, psychological distress and MHQ are different constructs. Cross-country cultural and sampling differences also matter. PolisMetric keeps the measures separate unless a single defensible study directly estimates their relationship in the same population.

POLISMETRICEvidence before narrative
Source & method

Country values are never filled from regional or global averages. Ipsos' Gen Z numbers are shown only as a labeled 29-country benchmark. The Global Mind Project reflects internet-enabled populations and cautions that MHQ differences of up to five points can fall within sampling noise.

Trusted sources · Health & wellness · 2018 baseline

Switzerland: who people trusted for health advice.

A directly comparable baseline from the Wellcome Global Monitor. “Most trusted source,” trust in government advice, and trust in medical workers are kept as separate measures. The survey was fielded in 2018; newer country-specific evidence is shown separately when a governed source is available.

Most trusted source79.7%

named doctors or nurses as the person they trusted most for medical or health advice.

2018 national sample n=1,000 · prevalence rank #18 of 35 current PolisMetric countries
Most trusted source · Q20

One question, six answer groups.

Bars use the full weighted country sample denominator, matching Wellcome’s published convention. “Don’t know” and refusals remain in the denominator and are preserved as missing-response metadata.

Doctors & nurses79.7%
Family & friends13.9%
Traditional healers4.9%
Religious leaders0.4%
None / someone else0.3%
Famous people0%

Don’t know / refused: 0.7% of the weighted sample.

Source trust · Q2181.5%

Government medical & health advice

Share answering that they trust government medical and health advice a lot or some.

Source trust · Q2294.2%

Medical workers’ advice

Share saying they trust advice from medical workers such as doctors and nurses a lot or some.

35-country comparison

Compare the same question across PolisMetric countries.

Switch measures to inspect directly comparable 2018 values. Bars show response prevalence, not a quality score or PolisMetric ranking.

Doctors or nurses named as the single most trusted sourceQ20: share of the weighted country sample naming a doctor or nurse as the person trusted most for medical or health advice.
Switzerland 79.7%Median 79.7%Available 35/35
1Singapore93.5%
2Norway93.2%
3Canada91.1%
4Italy90.7%
5Malaysia90.7%
6United Kingdom90.3%
7Belgium90.2%
8Sweden89.5%
9Australia89.4%
10France88.7%
11Thailand88.7%
12Spain88.1%
13United States88.1%
14Ireland85.2%
15Netherlands84%
16Taiwan83.3%
17Mexico81.4%
18Switzerland79.7%
19Argentina79.1%
20Vietnam78.7%
21India76.8%
22Indonesia76.1%
23Türkiye75.9%
24South Africa74.3%
25Poland71.9%
26Saudi Arabia71.2%
27South Korea71.2%
28Russia69.8%
29Philippines69.6%
30Japan69%
31Brazil65.1%
32Germany63.3%
33Israel63.1%
34China62.4%
35Austria58.7%
Dashed marker = median among countries with a published value for this exact measure. Hover, tap or use Tab to inspect rows.
Source & reuse

Gallup (2019), Wellcome Global Monitor – First Wave Findings. PolisMetric visualization and weighted aggregation from published survey fields. The Wellcome report states that its data and text are distributed under CC BY with attribution; report images are excluded. PolisMetric uses original charts and does not reproduce Wellcome’s graphic design.

Country percentages use the public within-country survey weight (wgt) and the full weighted country sample denominator, matching Wellcome's published country convention. Q21/Q22 combine 'A lot' + 'Some'. Don't know/refused responses remain in the denominator and are preserved as missing-response metadata; unavailable questions remain null and are never converted to zero. Fieldwork: April–December 2018. This supplemental module does not count as five independent People sources.

Source
Wellcome Global Monitor 2018
Population
Nationally representative adult country samples under Gallup World Poll methodology; exact eligible ages and interview modes vary by country.
Fieldwork
April–December 2018
Sample
Switzerland: N=1,000
Uncertainty
Not supplied for these displayed estimates; consult the source methodology.
Question and methods

Country percentages use the public within-country survey weight (wgt) and the full weighted country sample denominator, matching Wellcome's published country convention. Q21/Q22 combine 'A lot' + 'Some'. Don't know/refused responses remain in the denominator and are preserved as missing-response metadata; unavailable questions remain null and are never converted to zero.

Read source methods ↗

Source-defined populations and questions remain separate. Missing observations are not estimated or changed to zero.

AI & society · Pew Research Center · 2026

Pew's 2026 AI study did not survey Switzerland.

PolisMetric does not estimate, model or backfill a Pew value when the country was not included in this release. Other People evidence remains separate.

No directly comparable Pew 2026 observation.

Not surveyed in Pew Research Center's 2026 global AI attitudes release.

Missing is kept missing. It is not treated as zero and does not receive a comparative rank.
Source

Pew Research Center, Globally, More People Expect AI to Cause Job Loss Than Growth, published Sept. 17, 2026.

Pew surveyed 37 places overall. This PolisMetric comparison is restricted to the 25 countries that overlap the canonical 35-country universe. Source results are reproduced as attributed public toplines; PolisMetric does not reinterpret them as an original poll.

Source
Pew Research Center · Globally, More People Expect AI to Cause Job Loss Than Growth
Population
Source-defined national adult samples
Fieldwork
Country not surveyed
Sample
Country sample sizes: see the linked methodology
Uncertainty
Not supplied for these displayed estimates; consult the source methodology.
Question and methods

The selected measure uses the exact Pew topline question. U.S. fieldwork differs by measure, as printed on each card.

Read source methods ↗

Source-defined populations and questions remain separate. Missing observations are not estimated or changed to zero.

Switzerland · People Intelligence

Five sources. Five different stories.

Each finding comes from a different approved source and covers a different part of public life. Open the data view to inspect the measure, sample, evidence note and original source.

Financial resilience2025
Lloyd's Register Foundation World Risk Poll01 / 05

89.8% say their household could cover basic needs for at least a month

Key findingNearly nine in ten respondents in Switzerland said their household could cover basic needs for a month or more if income were lost.
Explore data
Financial resilience

89.8% say their household could cover basic needs for at least a month

2025
Published observations · 2025
Measure / groupPublished value
Married / partner53.3%
Neighbors care84.3%
1+ month buffer89.8%
Mental-health harm worry41.3%
Violent-crime harm worry56.1%
Question / measure

How Long Household Could Cover Basic Needs If Income Was Lost: A month or more

Sample

956 respondents on highlighted item

Evidence

canonical observation

Use class

OPEN ATTRIBUTION

Finding

Nearly nine in ten respondents in Switzerland said their household could cover basic needs for a month or more if income were lost.

Evidence note

Canonical World Risk Poll 2025 observation lrf-wrp-2025-che-household_buffer_month_plus. Weighted national estimate; item base differs from the full survey sample.

Open original source ↗
Source ↗
Life evaluation2023–2025
World Happiness Report / Gallup World Poll02 / 05

Average life evaluation is 7.018 out of 10

Key findingWorld Happiness Report 2026 reports a three-year average life evaluation of 7.018 for Switzerland.
Explore data
Life evaluation

Average life evaluation is 7.018 out of 10

2023–2025
Published observations · 2023–2025
Measure / groupPublished value
2023–2025 average7.018 / 10
Question / measure

Cantril Ladder life evaluation, 0 worst possible life to 10 best possible life

Sample

Gallup World Poll national samples; typically about 1,000 respondents per country per year

Evidence

publisher public result

Use class

PUBLIC RESULTS ONLY

Finding

World Happiness Report 2026 reports a three-year average life evaluation of 7.018 for Switzerland.

Evidence note

Publisher-released World Happiness Report 2026 Figure 2.1 national aggregate. Three-year average; this is a life-evaluation measure, not a measure of momentary emotion.

Open original source ↗
Source ↗
Institutional trust2025-09-10/2025-11-14
OECD03 / 05

62% report high or moderately high trust in the federal government

Key findingThe OECD Trust Survey found high or moderately high trust in Switzerland's federal government remained at 62% in 2025.
Explore data
Institutional trust

62% report high or moderately high trust in the federal government

2025-09-10/2025-11-14
Published observations · 2025-09-10/2025-11-14
Measure / groupPublished value
Police77%
Courts72%
Civil service62%
Federal government62%
Political parties49%
Question / measure

Trust in federal government on a 0–10 scale; high/moderately high = 6–10

Sample

Representative sample of the adult population

Evidence

publisher public result

Use class

PUBLIC RESULTS ONLY

Finding

The OECD Trust Survey found high or moderately high trust in Switzerland's federal government remained at 62% in 2025.

Evidence note

OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions 2026 Results: Switzerland. Representative adult survey; OECD defines high or moderately high trust as responses 6–10.

Open original source ↗
Source ↗
Public attitudesSelects pandemic-era survey data
FORS Selects04 / 05

Opposition to the COVID certificate ranged from 9% to 51% across EU-orientation groups

Key findingA FORS Selects public analysis found opposition to Switzerland's COVID certificate rose from 9% among people favoring greater EU cooperation to 51% among those favoring greater Swiss independence.
Explore data
Public attitudes

Opposition to the COVID certificate ranged from 9% to 51% across EU-orientation groups

Selects pandemic-era survey data
Published observations · Selects pandemic-era survey data
Measure / groupPublished value
Favor more EU cooperation9%
Favor more Swiss independence51%
Question / measure

Opposition to the COVID certificate by orientation toward EU cooperation versus Swiss independence

Sample

Selects respondents; see FORS documentation

Evidence

publisher public result

Use class

PUBLIC RESULTS ONLY

Finding

A FORS Selects public analysis found opposition to Switzerland's COVID certificate rose from 9% among people favoring greater EU cooperation to 51% among those favoring greater Swiss independence.

Evidence note

FORS Selects public analysis based on Selects survey data. This is a subgroup comparison tied to a specific pandemic-era policy and should be read as a historical attitudinal result, not a current population-wide opposition rate.

Open original source ↗
Source ↗
Political knowledgeUnderlying CSES studies predate the 2016 report
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)05 / 05

Correct-answer rates ranged from 48.4% to 61.4% across four CSES knowledge items

Key findingA CSES methodological report published in 2016 shows substantial variation across four political-knowledge items for Switzerland. PolisMetric treats this only as a dated historical benchmark, not a current reading.
Explore data
Political knowledge

Correct-answer rates ranged from 48.4% to 61.4% across four CSES knowledge items

Underlying CSES studies predate the 2016 report
Published observations · Underlying CSES studies predate the 2016 report
Measure / groupPublished value
UN Secretary-General item61.4%
Unemployment item56.5%
Finance item53.8%
Second-party item48.4%
Question / measure

Four CSES political-knowledge items: second party, finance, UN Secretary-General, and unemployment

Sample

CSES national election-study respondents; see report and study documentation

Evidence

publisher public result

Use class

OPEN COMMERCIAL OK

Finding

A CSES methodological report published in 2016 shows substantial variation across four political-knowledge items for Switzerland. PolisMetric treats this only as a dated historical benchmark, not a current reading.

Evidence note

CSES Political Knowledge Sub-Committee report table of country-level correct-answer shares. Historical benchmark from pre-2016 CSES studies. Item difficulty varies substantially, and CSES itself cautioned about cross-country comparability; do not interpret as a current national score.

Open original source ↗
Source ↗