People · Africa

South Africa

Source dates shown with each finding

← South Africa overview
South Africa · People

People Intelligence

Public opinion and socioeconomic subgroup evidence from approved external survey sources. Exact source framing and methodological caveats remain visible.

South Africa · Safety

83.4% worry that violent crime could cause serious harm

More than eight in ten respondents in South Africa said they were very or somewhat worried that violent crime could cause serious harm.

Lloyd's Register Foundation World Risk Poll · Fieldwork 2025

People · Generations · Financial milestones

The “maybe later” economy.

Housing, education, work and family choices increasingly collide with financial pressure. PolisMetric keeps the U.S. Pew benchmark separate from Deloitte’s same-wave Gen Z and millennial country evidence so unlike questions are never forced into one ranking.

Financial milestones: country evidence not yet available
Evidence gap

No source-verified 2026 country topline is published here yet for South Africa.

No country-specific 2026 financial-milestones topline has been source-verified for publication in the current governed pass. Missing is not estimated.

Missing is kept missing — never estimated, copied from a regional average or treated as zero.
Same-question international comparison

Financial pressure is delaying major life decisions.

These 15 country results come from the same Deloitte 2026 survey wave and the same question. Paired dots show published percentages for Gen Z and millennials; the connector shows the gap. This is not a quality ranking. Countries without a verified national value remain outside the ranking.

Thailand65%57%
Philippines64%64%
Argentina59%67%
Mexico57%52%
Italy56%51%
Australia55%45%
India54%44%
Sweden52%49%
Singapore51%50%
Netherlands51%45%
Switzerland46%60%
United Kingdom46%46%
China46%35%
Germany45%39%
Brazil45%36%

Deloitte Global 2026 Gen Z and Millennial Survey · fielded Nov. 24, 2025–Jan. 15, 2026 · online self-complete survey. The global study includes 22,595 respondents in 44 countries; this chart contains only source-verified country cuts in the current PolisMetric evidence pass.

Research status

Country-specific research remains open. The international chart above is evidence from other countries and is not presented as a value for South Africa.

Source
Deloitte Global 2026 Gen Z and Millennial Survey
Population
Gen Z and millennials in the source-defined national samples
Fieldwork
2025-11-24/2026-01-15
Sample
22,595 across 44 countries; country sample sizes vary
Uncertainty
Not supplied for these displayed estimates; consult the source methodology.
Question and methods

Share saying finances caused them to delay major life decisions. The separate U.S. Pew anchor uses a different population and question.

Read source methods ↗

Source-defined populations and questions remain separate. Missing observations are not estimated or changed to zero.

People Intelligence · South Africa · Young women

Political divides and mental health — measured as separate evidence streams.

PolisMetric does not assume that the U.S. pattern applies everywhere. For South Africa, political or gender-attitude evidence is shown only when a governed source supports it, and mental-health evidence is kept methodologically separate. An association is never inferred merely because both measures appear on the same page.

CoveragePolitics evidence · Mental-health evidenceNo synthetic national values
Political / values evidence

Feminist self-identification by gender

2026 country result + global Gen Z benchmark
29-country Gen Z benchmark54% women · 36% menMulti-country average — not substituted for South Africa's Gen Z result.
Mental-health evidence

Young-adult mind-health position

Ages 18–34 · 2024–2025

Sapien Labs' Global Mind Project ranks South Africa's internet-enabled 18–34 population at #46 of 84. This is a young-adult country context, not a women-only result and not a depression prevalence estimate.

Global young-adult referenceMHQ 36 · 41% distressed/strugglingGlobal 18–34 reference from the same report; not a national value for South Africa.
Interpretation ruleDo not turn two separate datasets into a causal story.

Political ideology, party affiliation, feminist self-identification, psychological distress and MHQ are different constructs. Cross-country cultural and sampling differences also matter. PolisMetric keeps the measures separate unless a single defensible study directly estimates their relationship in the same population.

POLISMETRICEvidence before narrative
Source & method

Country values are never filled from regional or global averages. Ipsos' Gen Z numbers are shown only as a labeled 29-country benchmark. The Global Mind Project reflects internet-enabled populations and cautions that MHQ differences of up to five points can fall within sampling noise.

Trusted sources · Health & wellness · 2018 baseline

South Africa: who people trusted for health advice.

A directly comparable baseline from the Wellcome Global Monitor. “Most trusted source,” trust in government advice, and trust in medical workers are kept as separate measures. The survey was fielded in 2018; newer country-specific evidence is shown separately when a governed source is available.

Most trusted source74.3%

named doctors or nurses as the person they trusted most for medical or health advice.

2018 national sample n=1,000 · prevalence rank #24 of 35 current PolisMetric countries
Most trusted source · Q20

One question, six answer groups.

Bars use the full weighted country sample denominator, matching Wellcome’s published convention. “Don’t know” and refusals remain in the denominator and are preserved as missing-response metadata.

Doctors & nurses74.3%
Family & friends12.5%
Religious leaders5.4%
Traditional healers5%
None / someone else1.1%
Famous people0.8%

Don’t know / refused: 0.9% of the weighted sample.

Source trust · Q2163.1%

Government medical & health advice

Share answering that they trust government medical and health advice a lot or some.

Source trust · Q2268.3%

Medical workers’ advice

Share saying they trust advice from medical workers such as doctors and nurses a lot or some.

35-country comparison

Compare the same question across PolisMetric countries.

Switch measures to inspect directly comparable 2018 values. Bars show response prevalence, not a quality score or PolisMetric ranking.

Doctors or nurses named as the single most trusted sourceQ20: share of the weighted country sample naming a doctor or nurse as the person trusted most for medical or health advice.
South Africa 74.3%Median 79.7%Available 35/35
1Singapore93.5%
2Norway93.2%
3Canada91.1%
4Italy90.7%
5Malaysia90.7%
6United Kingdom90.3%
7Belgium90.2%
8Sweden89.5%
9Australia89.4%
10France88.7%
11Thailand88.7%
12Spain88.1%
13United States88.1%
14Ireland85.2%
15Netherlands84%
16Taiwan83.3%
17Mexico81.4%
18Switzerland79.7%
19Argentina79.1%
20Vietnam78.7%
21India76.8%
22Indonesia76.1%
23Türkiye75.9%
24South Africa74.3%
25Poland71.9%
26Saudi Arabia71.2%
27South Korea71.2%
28Russia69.8%
29Philippines69.6%
30Japan69%
31Brazil65.1%
32Germany63.3%
33Israel63.1%
34China62.4%
35Austria58.7%
Dashed marker = median among countries with a published value for this exact measure. Hover, tap or use Tab to inspect rows.
Source & reuse

Gallup (2019), Wellcome Global Monitor – First Wave Findings. PolisMetric visualization and weighted aggregation from published survey fields. The Wellcome report states that its data and text are distributed under CC BY with attribution; report images are excluded. PolisMetric uses original charts and does not reproduce Wellcome’s graphic design.

Country percentages use the public within-country survey weight (wgt) and the full weighted country sample denominator, matching Wellcome's published country convention. Q21/Q22 combine 'A lot' + 'Some'. Don't know/refused responses remain in the denominator and are preserved as missing-response metadata; unavailable questions remain null and are never converted to zero. Fieldwork: April–December 2018. This supplemental module does not count as five independent People sources.

Source
Wellcome Global Monitor 2018
Population
Nationally representative adult country samples under Gallup World Poll methodology; exact eligible ages and interview modes vary by country.
Fieldwork
April–December 2018
Sample
South Africa: N=1,000
Uncertainty
Not supplied for these displayed estimates; consult the source methodology.
Question and methods

Country percentages use the public within-country survey weight (wgt) and the full weighted country sample denominator, matching Wellcome's published country convention. Q21/Q22 combine 'A lot' + 'Some'. Don't know/refused responses remain in the denominator and are preserved as missing-response metadata; unavailable questions remain null and are never converted to zero.

Read source methods ↗

Source-defined populations and questions remain separate. Missing observations are not estimated or changed to zero.

AI & society · Pew Research Center · 2026

How South Africa sees AI.

Four directly comparable measures from Pew Research Center’s 2026 global AI study. Rankings below describe the prevalence of each response among the 25 PolisMetric countries covered by this release; they are not quality scores.

Future of work44%

of adults say AI will lead to fewer jobs in South Africa over the next 20 years.

Share rank #16 of 25 covered PolisMetric countries · covered-country median 48%
Q57#16 / 25
44%

Expect AI to lead to fewer jobs

South Africa: 44%25-country median: 48%

Share of adults saying AI will lead to fewer jobs in their country over the next 20 years.

Field period: Feb. 8–May 13, 2026
Q56#15 / 25
28%

Expect AI to increase inequality

South Africa: 28%25-country median: 32%

Share saying AI will increase the gap between rich and poor in their country over the next 20 years.

Field period: Feb. 8–May 13, 2026
Q55#16 / 25
32%

More concerned than excited about AI

South Africa: 32%25-country median: 37%

Share saying they are more concerned than excited about the increased use of AI in daily life.

Field period: Feb. 8–May 13, 2026
Q54#14 / 25
37%

Have heard or read a lot about AI

South Africa: 37%25-country median: 41%

Share saying they have heard or read a lot about artificial intelligence.

Field period: Feb. 8–May 13, 2026
Cross-country comparison

See where South Africa sits among all 25 covered countries.

Switch the measure to compare every directly surveyed PolisMetric country on the same 0–100% scale. South Africa is highlighted; the gold marker shows the 25-country median.

Expect AI to lead to fewer jobsShare of adults saying AI will lead to fewer jobs in their country over the next 20 years.
South Africa 44%Median 48%Rank #16/25
1Australia76%
2South Korea76%
3United States71%
4Canada61%
5United Kingdom61%
6France60%
7Poland59%
8Italy55%
9Spain54%
10Germany51%
11Japan49%
12Netherlands48%
13Sweden48%
14Argentina47%
15Singapore46%
16Mexico44%
17South Africa44%
18Brazil42%
19Israel42%
20Malaysia41%
21Indonesia37%
22Thailand32%
23India29%
24Türkiye29%
25Philippines26%
Bars show published Pew toplines. The dashed vertical marker is the median among the 25 covered PolisMetric countries. Hover, tap or use Tab to inspect a row.
Source

Pew Research Center, Globally, More People Expect AI to Cause Job Loss Than Growth, published Sept. 17, 2026. International country results were fielded Feb. 8–May 13, 2026; U.S. measures shown here use the field periods printed on each card.

Pew surveyed 37 places overall. This PolisMetric comparison is restricted to the 25 countries that overlap the canonical 35-country universe. Source results are reproduced as attributed public toplines; PolisMetric does not reinterpret them as an original poll.

Source
Pew Research Center · Globally, More People Expect AI to Cause Job Loss Than Growth
Population
Source-defined national adult samples
Fieldwork
Feb. 8–May 13, 2026
Sample
Country sample sizes: see the linked methodology
Uncertainty
Not supplied for these displayed estimates; consult the source methodology.
Question and methods

The selected measure uses the exact Pew topline question. U.S. fieldwork differs by measure, as printed on each card.

Read source methods ↗

Source-defined populations and questions remain separate. Missing observations are not estimated or changed to zero.

South Africa · People Intelligence

Five sources. Five different stories.

Each finding comes from a different approved source and covers a different part of public life. Open the data view to inspect the measure, sample, evidence note and original source.

Safety2025
Lloyd's Register Foundation World Risk Poll01 / 05

83.4% worry that violent crime could cause serious harm

Key findingMore than eight in ten respondents in South Africa said they were very or somewhat worried that violent crime could cause serious harm.
Explore data
Safety

83.4% worry that violent crime could cause serious harm

2025
Published observations · 2025
Measure / groupPublished value
Married / partner22.9%
Neighbors care65.9%
1+ month buffer61.7%
Mental-health harm worry56.7%
Violent-crime harm worry83.4%
Question / measure

Worried Violent Crime Could Cause Serious Harm: Very or somewhat worried

Sample

992 respondents on highlighted item

Evidence

canonical observation

Use class

OPEN ATTRIBUTION

Finding

More than eight in ten respondents in South Africa said they were very or somewhat worried that violent crime could cause serious harm.

Evidence note

Canonical World Risk Poll 2025 observation lrf-wrp-2025-zaf-violent_crime_harm_worry. Weighted national estimate; item base differs from the full survey sample.

Open original source ↗
Source ↗
Life evaluation2023–2025
World Happiness Report / Gallup World Poll02 / 05

Average life evaluation is 5.009 out of 10

Key findingWorld Happiness Report 2026 reports a three-year average life evaluation of 5.009 for South Africa.
Explore data
Life evaluation

Average life evaluation is 5.009 out of 10

2023–2025
Published observations · 2023–2025
Measure / groupPublished value
2023–2025 average5.009 / 10
Question / measure

Cantril Ladder life evaluation, 0 worst possible life to 10 best possible life

Sample

Gallup World Poll national samples; typically about 1,000 respondents per country per year

Evidence

publisher public result

Use class

PUBLIC RESULTS ONLY

Finding

World Happiness Report 2026 reports a three-year average life evaluation of 5.009 for South Africa.

Evidence note

Publisher-released World Happiness Report 2026 Figure 2.1 national aggregate. Three-year average; this is a life-evaluation measure, not a measure of momentary emotion.

Open original source ↗
Source ↗
Identity & belonging2025-06-28/2025-07-19
Afrobarometer / Institute for Justice and Reconciliation03 / 05

58% identify equally with their ethnic group and South African nationality

Key findingAfrobarometer found 58% of South Africans identified equally with their ethnic group and their national identity, while 26% leaned more toward ethnic identity and 16% more toward national identity.
Explore data
Identity & belonging

58% identify equally with their ethnic group and South African nationality

2025-06-28/2025-07-19
Published observations · 2025-06-28/2025-07-19
Measure / groupPublished value
Both equally58%
More / only ethnic identity26%
More national identity16%
Question / measure

Relative identification with ethnic group and national identity

Sample

1,600 adult South African citizens

Evidence

publisher public result

Use class

PUBLIC RESULTS ONLY

Finding

Afrobarometer found 58% of South Africans identified equally with their ethnic group and their national identity, while 26% leaned more toward ethnic identity and 16% more toward national identity.

Evidence note

Afrobarometer Round 10 South Africa public result. Nationally representative citizen sample; category labels follow the source.

Open original source ↗
Source ↗
Values & religionSpring 2025
Pew Research Center04 / 05

80% say belief in God is necessary to be moral

Key findingPew Research Center found that 80% of South African adults said belief in God is necessary to be moral and have good values.
Explore data
Values & religion

80% say belief in God is necessary to be moral

Spring 2025
Published observations · Spring 2025
Measure / groupPublished value
Necessary80%
Not necessary19%
No answer / residual1%
Question / measure

Is belief in God necessary in order to be moral and have good values?

Sample

Nationally representative South African adult survey

Evidence

publisher public result

Use class

PUBLIC RESULTS ONLY

Finding

Pew Research Center found that 80% of South African adults said belief in God is necessary to be moral and have good values.

Evidence note

Pew Research Center Spring 2025 Global Attitudes Survey public topline. Publisher-released topline only; those who did not answer are not shown in Pew's chart.

Open original source ↗
Source ↗
Civic behavior2024/25
Human Sciences Research Council — South African Social Attitudes Survey05 / 05

59% say they would be likely to report corruption they experienced or witnessed

Key findingThe South African Social Attitudes Survey found 33% would be likely and 26% very likely to report corrupt behaviour they experienced or witnessed, for 59% combined.
Explore data
Civic behavior

59% say they would be likely to report corruption they experienced or witnessed

2024/25
Published observations · 2024/25
Measure / groupPublished value
Very likely26%
Likely33%
Not very likely23%
Not at all likely17%
Question / measure

If you experienced or witnessed corrupt behaviour, how likely is it that you would report it?

Sample

Nationally representative South African adult survey; report details

Evidence

publisher public result

Use class

PUBLIC RESULTS ONLY

Finding

The South African Social Attitudes Survey found 33% would be likely and 26% very likely to report corrupt behaviour they experienced or witnessed, for 59% combined.

Evidence note

HSRC public SASAS 2024/25 report. Combined 59% is the arithmetic sum of two published response categories, 33% likely and 26% very likely.

Open original source ↗
Source ↗